I think, therefore I blog

Cost Of Dominance

By , 21 November 2011

Cost Of Dominance
Cost Of Dominance

It has been suggested that in many circumstances being dominant is no more advantageous than being subordinate. For example, a dominant male may obtain a territory which is more resource-rich than that of a subordinate, but it may have to spend much more energy to protect it. Therefore, costs and benefits may more or less balance one another at each level in a dominance hierarchy, and evolution may favor the maintenance of the hierarchy itself, rather than just those near the top (which could lead to the disappearance of differences in dominance).

Source: Stanford University

Cost Of Dominance

About Roger Keays

Cost Of Dominance

Roger Keays is an artist, an engineer, and a student of life. Since he left Australia in 2009, he has been living as a digital nomad in over 40 different countries around the world. Roger is addicted to surfing. His other interests are music, psychology, languages, and finding good food. Click here to subscribe to his weekly blog, or stalk him on Facebook and Twitter.

Leave a Comment

Please visit https://RogerKeays.com/cost-of-dominance to add your comments.

Join 3,559 People Who Think Outside The Box

I write every Sunday about travel, psychology, technology, and all sorts of interesting stuff. It's completely free, and you can subscribe for as long as you like. Do it now, so you don't miss a single post.

Chat For A While

Your Vote Matters

Which Tech Company is the Creepiest?