Cost Of Dominance

By , 21 November 2011

Cost Of Dominance
Cost Of Dominance

It has been suggested that in many circumstances being dominant is no more advantageous than being subordinate. For example, a dominant male may obtain a territory which is more resource-rich than that of a subordinate, but it may have to spend much more energy to protect it. Therefore, costs and benefits may more or less balance one another at each level in a dominance hierarchy, and evolution may favor the maintenance of the hierarchy itself, rather than just those near the top (which could lead to the disappearance of differences in dominance).

Source: Stanford University

Cost Of Dominance
 

About Roger Keays

Cost Of Dominance

Roger Keays is an artist, an engineer, and a student of life. Since he left Australia in 2009, he has been living as a digital nomad in over 40 different countries around the world. Roger is addicted to surfing. His other interests are music, psychology, languages, and finding good food.

Leave a Comment

Please visit https://rogerkeays.com/cost-of-dominance to add your comments.